In Name Only review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/151/172151.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(OK) Powerfull trio. Lombard is as lovable as Grant sees her; and Francis is a bitch with conviction. Dialogues are a bit indicative; but actors and Cromwell make them dramatic The exteriors hace some charm...
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Heaven and Earth Magic review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/518/884518.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(YT) In this Harry Smith figurative images are a kind of abstraction, fresh and not so random surrealism (there are recurrent figures), no edition, figures apear and dissapear in the frame and transform inside...
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Dog Star Man: Part IV (1964) review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/614/6221614.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(YT) Some new figures, as a baby and the religious stained glass, takes its place among the disgregation internal movement stuff...
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Dog Star Man: Part III (1964) review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/623/6221623.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(YT) Oh, Brackage take its time to repeat and advance a little his abstraction and image disgregation, scarcely composing another figures, you see more of the mand, dog and mountain...
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Dog Star Man: Part II (1963) review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/647/6221647.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(OK) Second part is too similar to the first one, continue the disgregation and internalmovement of image and its traces, and some glimpses of the man, dog and mountain only theme...
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Dog Star Man: Part I (1962) review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/048/16262048.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(OK) Disgregation of image, sediments, and movement of traces inside, you can´t even distinguish the mand and tha do climbing the mountain only story and figure....
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Dog Star Man: Part I (1962) review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/048/16262048.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(OK) Disgregation of image, sediments, and movement of traces inside, you can´t even distinguish the mand and tha do climbing the mountain only story and figure....
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Mondo Cane review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/403/12668403.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(OK) As influent as execrable. Episodic and ambitious, good doccumentary camaerawork, good eye for stories and locations, but so prejudiced and cinic and distorsive, that today would be impossible to finf such a piece...
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
Tívoli review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/295/11696295.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(MU) Película sucia, irregular, con números muy mediocres, incluso Pérez Prado ya delata su decadencia a pesar de que pone en escena los grandes mambos de siempre...le humor y los diálogos son pobres, los actores son mejores, Lyn May es pésima actriz pero le mejor cuerpo de México...
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
The Young One review
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/642/7457642.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
(OK) An essay on morality with malice (the girl propiciates every bad thought) and a sort of scrifice of the evil (the liberation og the black one) to obtain the unfair prize of the young one.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)