Reviews by fernando

Deceiving. Widmark is ok seeming to be a very bad guy in the beginning, bot in th eminute you see he is the fantastic heroe; the film becomes corny.

God save Gordon from the oblivion. O'Brien fading hieratic while his ruined palace is exploding is the nearest to Leone Hollywood could get in tne middle sixties.

Bolognini at its best; decadence in people that hasn't even reach luxury or modernity. Claudia (excellent) and Jean Paul so condemmed lovers that become tender when harder they pretend to be. The feudal background of the heritage is just that and ok.

After this, now I know Sontag, even with some ideas well explained. Good testimony of previous female lovers.

Sincere. Nahid is really stupid to tolerate such mysoginistic system against her. Iranian conformist realism.

All the elements to make your own judgment on Knox's guilt; but lacks of -at least- a resume of the facts and lies we knox she is really guilty of. Americans are too protective with her jewells abroad?

Subtle idea for a doccumentary: why a young innocent lampedusian boy is anguished, without knowing, with the refugees crisis.

Good paced, nightmarish but quiet story of guilt more than pity before a resentful wife. McConnaughey ok, better than use of location.2

Baroque in themes (gigolo, romane, fascism, crisis) but not in style. Dietrich is more respectful than moving, Bowing is learning, Rome is excellent, Novak amuses herself, Maria Schell ok.

Simple, straightforward, rude, softporn, nunxploitation, good location. Best of all the sadomasoquist stuff between nuns. Spaak kissing the floor, good moment